Comparative Study of the Use of Learning Modules and Learning Motivation on Integrated Science Learning Outcomes of Junior High School Students in Jember
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31537/jeti.v7i1.1777Keywords:
Module, Learning Motivation,, Learning OutcomesAbstract
The teacher as the main actor in learning is required to be able to provide meaning and understanding of each chapter studied. Teachers must be able to develop Integrated Science lessons in such a way that they can be challenging, impressive and excite students in learning. From this view, it can be concluded that to improve the cognitive and mental development of students optimally, the process of interaction and communication. The existence of an effective and good module must meet various existing criteria such as communicative, detailed, simple and straightforward, attractive layout, pictures, tables, graphs and other illustrations, concise and practical examples. Through the learning module media, integrated science material will be better presented and effectively support student learning success. This research uses a comparative quantitative approach. The sample in the study were seventh grade students with a total of 62 students in the jember district analysed using the independent T test. the conclusion of the study which states that there is no more dominant difference between the use of learning modules and learning motivation on student learning outcomes of integrated science subjects of class VIII junior high school students in jember
References
Adi Kesuma, I. N. A., Yoda, I. K., & Hidayat, S. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran dan Motivasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar PJOK pada Siswa SMP. Jurnal Penjakora, 8(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.23887/penjakora.v8i1.31091
Arends, R. I. (2015). Learning to Teach (9th ed.). MacGraw Hill.
Bahrum, S., & Ibrahim, M. N. (2018). Kebolehgunaan Modul “steAm” dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Seni Visual Sekolah Rendah. KUPAS SENI: Jurnal Seni Dan Pendidikan Seni, 6, 65–79.
Canan AYDINBEK. (2021). The Effect of Instruction in Reading Strategies on the Reading Achievement of Learners of French. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research Www.Ejer.Com.Tr, 91, 0–3. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2021.91.15
Degeng, I. N. S. (2017). Interactive Effects Of Instructioal Strategy And Learner On caracteristics ON Learning Effectiveness and Appeal. Kapita Selekta Karya Ilmiah Dosen Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang, 0(0). http://pasca.um.ac.id/conferences/index.php/kskid/article/view/296
Dimyati, & Mudjiono. (2009). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Rineka Cipta.
Hasni. (2019). Melalui Permainan Kartu Angka Dapat Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif Anak dalam Mengenal Benda-Benda. Jurnal Edukasi Dan Sains, 1(1), 99–117.
Ikrom, Fadhli Dzil & Hidayah, S. C. N. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Index Card Match Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Elemen, 5(1), 12–22.
Kemendikbud. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. In Modul Pelatihan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013.
Khasanah, A. N., Sajidan, S., & Widoretno, S. (2017). Effectiveness of critical thinking indicator-based module in empowering student’s learning outcome in respiratory system study material. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.8490
Kognitif, D. A. N. G., Valencia-vallejo, N., Nacional, U., Omar, P., Nacional, U., & Luis, P. (2015). PENGARUH PERANCAH MOTIVASI PADA LINGKUNGAN E-LEARNING?: SELF-EFFICACY , BELAJAR.
Kumar, M., & Kogut, G. (2006). Students’ perceptions of problem?based learning? Teacher Development, 10(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530600587295
Langford, P. E. (2005). Vygotsky’s Developmental and Educational Psychology. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203499573
Liew, T. W., Mat Zin, N. A., & Sahari, N. (2017). Exploring the affective, motivational and cognitive effects of pedagogical agent enthusiasm in a multimedia learning environment. Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-017-0089-2
Marlina, E., Rinsyad, A., Antasyari Pratama, B., Bimbingan Konseling Islam, J., Dakwah dan Komunikasi, F., & Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, U. (2021). Optimalisasi Pembelajaran Melalui Metode Hybrid pada Masa Pandemi di Kabupaten Ciamis. Proceedings Uin Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 1(31), 1–17. https://proceedings.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/proceedings/article/view/331
Nurhayati, H., Robandi, B., & Mulyasari, E. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Tgt Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 3(1), 1–12.
Nurnaningsih, Sowanto, Mulyadin, E., Mutmainah, & Murtalib. (2023). PENGEMBANGAN MODUL PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING ( PBL ) UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS SISWA. SUPERMAT Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 241–259.
Parmin, & Peniati, E. (2012). PENGEMBANGAN MODUL MATA KULIAH STRATEGI BELAJAR MENGAJAR IPA BERBASIS HASIL PENELITIAN PEMBELAJARAN. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 1(1), 8–15.
Priawasana, E., Degeng, I. N. S., Utaya, S., & Kuswandi, D. (2020). An Experimental Analysis on the Impact of Elaboration Learning on Learning Achievement and Critical Thinking. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(7), 3274–3279. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080757
Rachim, F. (2019). How to STEAM Your Classroom: Revo 4.0 Model - Outside The Box (D. Hadiana (ed.); 1st ed.). DPP Asosiasi Guru Teknologi Informasi Indonesia (AGTIFINDO).
Restuningtyas, N., & Hasibuan, R. (2022). Pengaruh Media Buku Cerita Bergambar Terhadap Perkembangan Bahasa Anak Kelompok B Di Tk Tadika Puri Surabaya. Jurnal PAUD Teratai, 11, 59–64.
Sadiman, A. S. (2010). Media Pendidikan pengertian, pengembanan dan manfaat (R. Press (ed.); 14th ed.). rajawali pers.
Sarmanu. (2017). Dasar Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Statistika. Airlangga University Press.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). learning Theories an eduatiol prespective (6th ed.).
Solihati, A. (2018). Peningkatan kemampuan membaca alquran melalui permainan huruf kartu hijaiyah. Jurnal Pelita PAUD, 2(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33222/pelitapaud.v2i2.242
Sudjana, N. (2012). Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Sinar Baru Algesindo.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. CV Alfabeta.
Suwono, H., Pratiwi, H. E., Susanto, H., & Susilo, H. (2017). Enhancement of students’ biological literacy and critical thinking of biology through socio-biological case-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.9622
Ümit Demiral, & Çepni, S. (2018). Journal of Science Education and Technology Examining Preservice Science Teachers ’ Argumentation Skills in Terms of their Critical Thinking and Content Knowledge Levels?: An Example Using GMOs. TURKISH SCIENCE EDUCATION, 15(3), 128–151. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10241a
Watson, S. L., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2008). The Learner-Centered Paradigm of Education. Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315795478
Wingkel, W. S. (2009). Psikologi Pengajaran. Media Abdi.
Yuliya. (2019). Hubungan Antara Dukungan Orangtua Dengan Motivasi Belajar Pada Remaja. 7(2), 250–256.
Yuristia, F., Hidayati, A., & Ratih, M. (2022). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Tematik Muatan Materi IPA Berbasis Problem Based pada Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar Fatma Yuristia 1 , Abna Hidayati 2 , Maistika Ratih 3 ?. Jurnal Albasicedu, 6(2), 2400–2409.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Robith Firdausi Ahmad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
