THE EFFECT OF PAKEM METHODS AND LEARNING MOTIVATION TOWARDS EIGHT GRADE STUDENT’S LEARNING OUTCOMES ON IPS at SMP PGRI 2 MUNCAR BANYUWANGI

Authors

  • Marsitin Marsitin SMP PGRI 2 Muncar Banyuwangi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31537/jeti.v6i1.1007

Keywords:

PAKEM., Motivation, Learning outcomes

Abstract

This study is a causal, quantitative research are : 1) Is there any influence on learning outcomes ?, 2) Is there any influence of learning motivation to ward student learning result ?, and 3) Is there any interaction influence of PAKEM) learning and learning motivation to ward student learning result ? Objectives : 1) The examine the impact of PAKEM learning on student learning outcomes. 2) examine the effect of learningmotivation on the student learning outcomes. 3) examine of the influence  of PAKEM learning motivation  on  student learning outcomes.

The population of this studied in this research is the students of SMP PGRI 2 Muncar distric Banyuwangi, with the number of 30 student, the research area is determined by purposive sampling method. The research is aquantitative research with causal design.Data collection tools use questionnaires, test and methods of documentationand intervew. Valid and valid realibility tools with validity and reliability tets. The instrument analysis test use :1) descriptive  test, 2) normality  test, 3) homogeneity test. Test the hypotesis by : 1) regression analysis, 2) F test, 3) t test,4) testcoefficient of determination (R2).

The resultshowed that: 1) sig showed that: 1) sig value of learning variables PAKEM on studentlearning outcomes 0,000, conclusion sig>0,05, mean  learning  of PAKEM have signifficant effectto resultof studentlearning, 2) sig value of learning of motivation variable is 0,000, sig conclusion>0,05 this means learning motivation has a signifficant effecc on student learningoutcomes, 3) the output of regression analysis obtained F hitung 29,142 with sig. 0,000, because > 0,05 then there is interaction influence of learning of PAKEM and motivation learn earnestly to result learn

References

Ahmad Sudrajat (2007), Pengaruh Model PAKEM Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. stthami.ac.article.download

Alvin , (2010), Teori Belajar Dan pembelajaran, Medan Persada

Arifin, Muhammad Zinal ,(2011), Evaluasi Pembelajaran Perinsip Tehnik, Prosedur, Bandung. PT Rosdakarya

Arifin, Muhammad Zinal (2012), Pengaruh Latar Belakang Tingkat Pendidikan, Bandung Remaja Rosdakarya

Azwar, Syaifudin (2011), Metode Penelitian, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar

Amri, Sofyan Khoiru, Ahmad ( 2010), Proses Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Inovatif Dalam Kelas, Jakarta PT Prestasi Pustakarya

Conny R Prof. Dr (2008), Belajar dan Pembelajaran Sekolah dan Praktek Dasar. Jakarta. PT Index

Davis Keith (2007), Perilaku Dalam Organisasi, Jakarta PT Erlangga

Depdiknas (2005), Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi, Jakarta Direktorat PPTK

Dimyati dan Mudjiono, ( 2015) Pembelajaran Kooperatif, Jakarta, PT Rineka Cipta

Dweck dan Elliot, (1983), Strategi Pembelajaran,Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar

Djamarah, Zain Aswan (2016), Strategi Belajar Mengajar, Jakarta Rineka Cipta

Donal, Kieso, dkk(2007), Akutansi Intermedia, Edisi Keduabelas, Jakarta

Fontana dan Winataputra dkk, (1992) , Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran, Jakarta, Universitas Terbuka

Gagne, Robert M (2013), Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran dan Motivasi Repositoring unpas.Mc.id

Hamalik, Oumar (1992), Dasar Pengembangan Kurikulum, Yogyakarta Tiara Wacana.

Hartono, (2012) PAKEM, Yogyakarta, Pustska Pelajar

Joyce, Borce dkk, (2009), Model-model Pengajaran edisi kedelapan, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar

Masidjo, (2007), Prosedur Penelitian, Jakarta Rineka Cipta

Morgan, (1971), Introduction To Psycology, Tokyo Grow Hall, Departemen Agama RI

Monks, (1989), Psikologi Perkembangan, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta

Moslow, Abraham (1969), Teori Motivasi DanProses Belajar, library walisongo. ac.id.disk

Mulibbin, Syah (2013), Psycology Pendidikan Dengan Pendekatan Baru, Bandung. PT Rosdakarya Remaja Mulyana Blogspot.com, Motivasi Belajar

Nasution (1990), Interaksi Dan Motivasi Belajar, Jakarta

Nasution, dkk, (1997), Pengaruh Strategi Teori-Teori Belajar, Jakarta, Erlangga

Napitupulu (2011) , Studi Kasus Permasalahan Pendidikan di Indonesia, Kantor Prinsipil UNESCO

Riduwan (2004), Metode Dan Tehnik Menyusun Tesis, Alfabeth Bandung.

Robert dkk, (2007), Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran, Yogyakarta Pustaka Pelaja

Rusman (2014), Model-model Pembelajaran, Jakarta Raja Grafindo Persada

Purwanto (2016), Evaluasi Hasil Belajar, Yogyakarta Pustaka Pelajar

Sugiyono 2013, Metode Penelitian Bisnis, Bandung CV Alphabet

Sugiyono, 2016, Metode Penelitian, repo unpas.ac.td

Sudjana, Nana (1996),)Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar , Bandung Remaja Rosdakarya

Sunarya, (2010), Strategi Belajar Mengajar, Bandung CV Pustaka Setia

Silberman, M (2007), Active Learning 101, Strategi Pembelajaran, Yogyakarta Pustaka Utama Madani

Singgih Gunarso, (2008), Psikologi Perkembangan Anak dan Remaja, Jakarta. BPK Gunung Mulia

Suharsini, Arikunto (2010), Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, Jakarta, Rineka Cipta

Schein, (1991) Culture and Performance, PT Prenhalindo, Jakarta.

Titon, (2006), Teori dan Metode Penelitian, etd revositoring ugm.ac.id

Winkel, (1991), Penilaian Hasil Belajar Mengajar, Bandung Remaja Rosdakarya

Winarno, (2003) Pengaruh Pergaulan Teman Sebaya Dan Motivasi Belajar, Repository unpas.ac.id

Downloads

Published

2023-10-01

How to Cite

Marsitin, M. (2023). THE EFFECT OF PAKEM METHODS AND LEARNING MOTIVATION TOWARDS EIGHT GRADE STUDENT’S LEARNING OUTCOMES ON IPS at SMP PGRI 2 MUNCAR BANYUWANGI. Journal of Education Technology and Inovation, 6(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.31537/jeti.v6i1.1007

Issue

Section

Articles