KARAKTERISTIK TINGKAT KREATIVITAS MAHASISWA CALON GURU DALAM MEMODIFIKASI TUGAS MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31537/laplace.v5i1.940Keywords:
kreativitas, calon guru, gaya belajarAbstract
Kemampuan berkreativitas yang dimiliki mahasiswa calon guru dalam memodifikasi tugas berbeda-beda, hal ini karena masing-masing mahasiswa calon guru memiliki cara yang berbeda dalam mengolah bahan informasi yang diperoleh. Cara yang digunakan dalam menyerap, mengatur dan mengolah bahan informasi yang diberikan dalam pembelajaran adalah gaya belajar mereka masing-masing. Berdasarkan cara belajar yang berbeda ini, maka dari itu setiap orang memiliki cara belajar efektif yang berbeda untuk satu sama lain. Terdapat tiga jenis gaya belajar yang paling utama yaitu visual, auditory (auditorial), dan kinaesthetic (kinestetik). Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah 8 orang mahasiswa calon guru. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan tes tertulis dan wawancara. Instrumen utama dalam penelitian ini adalah peneliti sendiri. Instrumen pendukungnya berupa angket kreativitas dan angket gaya belajar.Peneliti telah memberikan tugas matematika yang terdapat dalam buku sekolah elektronik (BSE) kepada mahasiswa calon guru untuk memodifikasi tugas tersebut. Hasil analisis terhadap tugas yang telah dimodifikasi menunjukkan bahwa 3 guru memiliki karakteristik gaya belajar yang berbeda-beda. dapat disimpulkan mahasiswa calon guru dengan gaya belajar visual lebih baik kreativitasnya dari pada mahasiswa calon guru dengan gaya auditorial dan kinestetik. Hal ini dikarenakan mahasiswa calon guru dapat menunjukkan indikator kreativitas kebaruan dan fleksibilitas atau kefasihan dan kebaruan.
Downloads
References
Arifani, Y., Khaja, F. N. M., Suryanti, S., & Wardhono, A. (2019). The Influence of Blended In-service Teacher Professional Training on EFL Teacher Creativity and Teaching Effectiveness. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 25(3), 126–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2019-2503-10
Bire, A. L., Geradus, U., & Bire, J. (2014). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, Dan Kinestetik Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Kependidikan, 44(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v44i2.5307
Breen, S., & O’Shea, A. (2010). Mathematical thinking and task design. Irish Mathematical Society Bulletin, 66, 39–49.
Craft, A. (1998). Educator perspectives on creativity: An English study. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(4), 244–257.
DeHaan, R. L. (2009). Teaching creativity and inventive problem solving in science. Life Sciences Education Journal, 8(3), 172–181.
Erdogan, A., & Yemenli, E. (2019). Gifted students’ attitudes towards mathematics: a qualitative multidimensional analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(1), 37–52.
Goldin, G. A. (2017). Mathematical creativity and giftedness?: perspectives in response. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(1), 147–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017- 0837-9
Gråstén, A. (2016). Children ’ s expectancy beliefs and subjective task values through two years of school-based program and associated links to physical education enjoyment and physical activity. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 5(4), 500–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2015.12.005
Harris, A. (2016). Creativity and education. Springer.
Hershkowitz, R., Tabach, M., & Dreyfus. (2017). Creative reasoning and shifts of knowledge in the mathematics classroom. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 49(1), 25–36.
Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. (2014). The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1002/per.1941
Kandemir, M. A., dkk. (2019). Measurement of Creative Teaching in Mathematics Class. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 272–283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641677
Kaur, B., dan Y. (2019). Pathways to Reasoning and Communication in the Secondary School Mathematics Classroom. National Institute of Education.
Khezri, H., Lavasani, M. G., Malahmadi, E., & Amani, J. (2010). The role of self- efficacy , task value , and achievement goals in predicting learning approaches and mathematics achievement. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences Journal, 5, 942–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.214
Khodabakhshzadeh, H., dkk. (2018). EFL Teachers ’ Creativity and Their Teaching ’ s Effectiveness?: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 227–238.
Kullberg, A. (2012). Students’ Open Dimensions of Variation. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1, 168–181.
Lee, K., Lee, E., & Park, M. (2016). Task Modification and Knowledge Utilization by Korean Prospective Mathematics Teachers. Pedagogical Research, 2(1), 1–13.
Leikin, R., Subotnik, R., Pitta-Pantazi, D., Singer, F.M., & Pelczer, I. (2013). Teachers’ views on creativity in mathematics education: an international survey. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(2), 309–324.
Lev-Zamir, H., & Leikin, R. (2011). Creative mathematics teaching in the eye of the beholder: focusing on teachers’ conceptions. Research in Mathematics Education, 13(1), 17–32.
Marwanto, R. (2020). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Materi Persamaan Kuadrat Melalui Model Pembelajaran Think Pair Share Berbantuan Komputer Pada Siswa Kelas IX SMP Negeri 26 Semarang. Delta: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31941/delta.v8i1.970
Memmert, D. (2015). Teaching tactical creativity in sport: Research and practice. Routledge.
Muklis, M., & Tohir, M. (2019). Instrumen Pengukur Creativity and Innovation Skills Siswa Sekolah Menengah di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Indonesian Journal of Mathematics and Natural Science Education, 1(1), 65–73.
Pourhosein, G. (2011). Visual, Auditory, Kinaesthetic Learning Styles and Their Impacts on English Language Teaching. Journal of Studies in Education, 2(1), 104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v2i1.1007
Rose, C. & Nicholl, M. . (2002). Accelerated Learning for The 21st Century (alih bahasa oleh Dedi Ahimsa). Nuansa.
Siswono, T. (2008). Model Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Pengajuan Dan Pemecahan Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berfikir Kreatif. Unesa university press.
Sullivan, P., Clarke, D., & Clarke, B. (2009). Converting Mathematics Tasks to Learning Opportunities?: An Important Aspect of Knowledge for Mathematics Teaching Plenty of Interesting Ideas but Where are the Interesting. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(1), 85–105.
Thompson, D. (2012). Modifying Textbook Exercise to Incorporate Reasoning and Communication Into The Primary Mathematics Classroom. World Scientific Publishing Company.
Zahra, P., dkk. (2013). Effectiveness of Training Creativity on Preschool Students. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 643–647.
Zawojewski, J.S., & McCarthy, L. (2007). Numeracy in Practice. Principal Leadership, 7(5), 32–37.
